Remember last year when subway’s bread was deemed to NOT be bread because it contained too much sugar? Well, they’re back in the news with a lawsuit on their hands.
A couple people in California claimed that Subway’s tuna doesn’t contain real tuna. The lawsuit stated that independent labs tested samples of the tuna and found that it’s a mixture of various concoctions that do not constitute tuna but it LOOKS like tuna. It doesn’t say what IS in the tuna though.
The people that are suing are hoping to have it certified as a class-action lawsuit. Subway says that the claims are false and their tuna is in fact real.
